Computer users and programmers have become so accustomed to using Windows, in any event, for the changing capacities and the appearances of the graphical point of the interface of the versions, accordingly, it has remained Microsoft’s product. Despite the fact that Lycoris, Red Hat, Mandrake, Suse, Knoppix, Slackware, and Lindows make up some of the different versions of LINUX. So companies release their own versions of the operating systems with some minor changes, and yet always with the same bottom line. The basic fact is that not one of these companies is close to competing with Windows, for the most part, causing the difference in market share.
It sometimes seems everyone in the world is using Windows. Many say Windows is way better compared to LINUX due to the simple handling of the software or hardware. There are so many differences between the number of users of LINUX and Windows. Many say LINUX is far superior because it started as an Open Source software and in this manner is more flexible than Windows. Then what accounts for the big difference in market share between these two operating systems?
Windows and UNIX operating systems are completely different in varied ways.
- Windows GUI is an integral component of the OS; speed, effectiveness, and reliability, while the Linux GUI is optional, are increased by running a server instance of Linux without a GUI, something that server versions of Windows basically can’t do. The idea of the Linux GUI makes remote administration of a Linux computer easier with a more regular feel than Windows computers
- Command prompts are very different in the operating system. The command interpreters in the Windows 9x series are basically the same as one another and the NT class versions of Windows likewise have command interpreters there are, however, Variations between a Windows 9x command interpreter and one in an NT class flavor of Windows. Linux similar to UNIX also supports multiple command interpreters, yet it typically uses BASH or “Bourne Again Shell”.
- While you need to pay hundreds of dollars for another Windows version, you can simply go download Linux. There are no manuals simple installers for the free version. In spite of the fact that there is quite a learning curve when utilizing the free package. There are some easily automated packages of Linux for a low cost.
Microsoft’s “huge con” is the supposed security issues with windows. Most spyware, adware, and malicious files programs work with Windows simply fine. Overall you do not deal with these kinds of circumstances unless you are working with Windows. though Linux offers strong protection, password protection for Windows can be bypassed with ease.
Software availability is the key to why Windows wins over Linux during this competition. Most releases of software are already configured for Windows. Assuming you decided to use Linux you should copy Windows with special software in order to use your windows-based programs. you may install Windows as a scheme to Linux, this might take the administrative capabilities of Windows and allow them to function on Linux.
If Linux is ever to vie with Windows, it should become a lot of easy and provide serious technical support.